Notes to Max Weber

1. In Weber’s discussion of modern selfhood, then, we see a reflection of the origin of one of the great paradoxes of modern philosophy. The philosophy of engagement and objectification has helped create a picture of a human being, at its most extreme in certain forms of materialism, from which the last vestiges of subjectivity seem to have been expelled. It is a picture of a human being seen completely from a third-person perspective. The paradox is that this severe outlook is connected with – indeed based on – attributing a central place to the first-person stance. Radical objectivity is intelligible and accessible only through radical subjectivity, which has been of course much commented on by Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty. Such a paradoxical interplay between introspective self-reflexivity and instrumental objectification of the self and mastery of the world constitutes the modern “inward turn” as Charles Taylor calls it [Taylor 1989]. It is also salient in the psychological dynamics that Weber captured with his genealogical construction of the Puritan Berufsmensch as the ideal-typical moral agency that has spawned the modern world.

Copyright © 2012 by
Sung Ho Kim <>

Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free

The SEP would like to congratulate the National Endowment for the Humanities on its 50th anniversary and express our indebtedness for the five generous grants it awarded our project from 1997 to 2007. Readers who have benefited from the SEP are encouraged to examine the NEH’s anniversary page and, if inspired to do so, send a testimonial to