Annotated Bibliography on Analysis
§5: Conceptions of Analysis in the 19th Century
This bibliography is intended as a reference guide to the key works
that deal, in whole or in part, with analysis and related topics such
as analyticity and definition. Cross-references are by name(s) of
author(s) or editor(s) and either year of publication or abbreviation
as indicated immediately after their name(s). Notes in square brackets
at the end of an entry indicate the relevant part(s) of the work
and/or its significance to the topic of analysis. This section of the
bibliography corresponds to Section 5 of the main entry, and is
divided into subsections which correspond to the subsections of the
supplementary document on
Conceptions of Analysis in the 19th Century.
Where works include important material under more than one heading,
they are cited under each heading; but duplication has been kept to a
minimum. Cross-references to other (sub)sections are provided in curly
brackets.
Annotated Bibliography on Analysis: Full List of Sections
- Bambach, Charles R., 1995, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis
of Historicism, Cornell University Press [ch. 1: scientism and
historicism; ch. 2: Windelband; ch. 3: Rickert; ch. 4: Dilthey; ch. 5:
Heidegger]
- Craig, Edward, 1987, The Mind of God and the Works of
Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Magee, Bryan, 1983, The Philosophy of Schopenhauer,
Oxford: Oxford University Press [31-5: analysis and synthesis]
- Peckhaus, Volker, 1997, Logik, Mathesis universalis und
allgemeine Wissenschaft, Berlin: Akademie Verlag [chs. 5-6:
algebra of logic in England and Germany]
- Pickstone, John V., 1994, ‘Museological Science? The Place of
the Analytical/Comparative in Nineteenth-Century Science, Technology
and Medicine’, Hist. Sci. 32, 111-38 [transition in the
19th c. from savant/connoisseur to analytical/comparative science;
analysis as decomposition]
- Schmaus, Warren, 1982, ‘The Concept of Analysis in Comte’s
Philosophy of Mathematics’, Phil. Res. Arch. 8 [Comte on
the historical succession of (ever more powerful) methods of
analysis]
- Schopenhauer, Arthur, WWR, The World as Will and
Representation, 1st ed. 1819, 2nd ed. 1844, 3rd ed. 1859,
tr. E.F.J. Payne, 2 vols., New York: Dover, 1969;
tr. orig. publ. 1958 [I, §§ 14-15: demonstration]
- Weiler, Gershon, 1970, Mauthner’s Critique of Language,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [chs. 3, 6-7: language and
logic]
- Beiser, Frederick C., (ed.), 1993, The Cambridge Companion to
Hegel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [includes Burbidge
1993, Forster 1993, Hylton 1993]
- Bowie, Andrew, 1997, From Romanticism to Critical Theory,
London: Routledge [ch. 4: ‘Interpretative reasons’; ch. 5:
‘The ethics of interpretation: Schleiermacher’]
- -----, 1998, ‘Introduction’ to Schleiermacher
HC, vii-xxxi [xxi: Schleiermacher’s rejection of
analytic/synthetic dist.]
- Burbidge, John, 1981, On Hegel’s Logic, Atlantic
Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press
- -----, 1993, ‘Hegel’s conception of logic’, in Beiser
1993, 86-101
- Craig, Edward, 1987, The Mind of God and the Works of
Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Forster, Michael, 1993, ‘Hegel’s dialectical method’, in
Beiser 1993, 130-70
- Goethe, Johann W., Faust [I, lines 1908-1941: Meph. vs.
analysis]
- -----, 1829, ‘Analyse und Synthese’, in Goethe
SN, Band 11: Aufsätze, Fragmente, Studien zur
Naturwissenschaft im Allgemeinen, ed. Dorothea Kuhn and Wolf von
Engelhardt, Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1970, 301-3
- -----, SN, Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft,
ed. K. Lothar Wolf et al., Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus
Nachfolger
- Hegel, G.W.F., PS, Phenomenology of Spirit,
1807, tr. A.V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977
[§32: analysis as destructive dissolution]
- -----, SL, Science of Logic, 1812,
tr. A.V. Miller, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1969 [812-14:
geometrical synthesis]
- -----, SW, Sämtliche Werke:
Jubiläumsausgabe in 20 Bänden, ed. Hermann Glockner,
Stuttgart: Frommann, 1927-30 [Vol. 8, 119, 449: analysis]
- -----, HR, The Hegel Reader, ed. Stephen
Houlgate, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998 [59: analysis as dissolution; 307-8:
alphabetic writing vs. hieroglyphics]
- Hylton, Peter, 1993, ‘Hegel and analytic philosophy’, in
Beiser 1993, 445-85
- Inwood, Michael, 1992, A Hegel Dictionary, Oxford:
Blackwell [entry under ‘definition’]
- Kaufmann, Walter, 1991, Goethe, Kant, and Hegel, New
Brunswick: Transaction, orig. publ. 1980 [§12: Goethe and
analysis]
- Petry, Michael John, (ed.), 1993, Hegel and Newtonianism,
Dordrecht: Kluwer [includes Pozzo 1993 and Wehrle 1993]
- Pozzo, Riccardo, 1993, ‘Analysis, Synthesis and Dialectic:
Hegel’s Answer to Aristotle, Newton and Kant’, in Petry 1993,
27-39 [Hegel’s dialectic as summing up traditional analysis and
synthesis]
- Schelling, F.W.J., 1803, Ideas for a Philosophy of
Nature, 2nd ed., 1st ed. 1797, tr. E.E. Harris and P. Heath,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [171-2, 187-90: analysis
vs. synthesis, and the concept of matter; 258: analysis as infinite
dissolution]
- Schiller, Friedrich, AE, On the Aesthetic Education
of Man, 1795, rev. 1801, ed. and tr. Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and
L.A. Willoughby, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 [I 4, VI 10:
vs. analysis; cf. 222-3]
- Schleiermacher, Friedrich, D, Dialektik, 1822,
ed. R. Odebrecht, Leipzig, 1942
- -----, HC, Hermeneutics and Criticism, 1838,
tr. and ed. Andrew Bowie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
[includes Bowie 1998, Schleiermacher SL]
- -----, SL, ‘Schematism and Language’, from
Schleiermacher, D, 370-81, tr. in Schleiermacher HC,
271-80
- Small, Robin, 1983, ‘Dialectic from the Analytic Point of
View’, Metaphilosophy 14, 19-31 [on Hegel’s
dialectic]
- Wehrle, Walter E., 1993, ‘The Conflict between Newton’s
Analysis of Configurations and Hegel’s Conceptual Analysis’, in
Petry 1993, 17-26 [Hegelian analysis as Aristotelian rather than
Newtonian]
- Bambach, Charles R., 1995, Heidegger, Dilthey, and the Crisis
of Historicism, Cornell University Press [ch. 1: scientism and
historicism; ch. 2: Windelband; ch. 3: Rickert; ch. 4: Dilthey]
{§5.1}
- Cassirer, Ernst, 1910, Substanzbegriff und
Funktionsbegriff, Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, tr. as Substance
and Function, Chicago: Open Court, 1923 [ch. 5, §2:
induction and analysis]
- -----, 1913, ‘Erkenntnistheorie nebst den Grenzfragen der
Logik’, Jahrbücher der Philosophie 1, 1-59
- Friedman, Michael, 2000, A Parting of the Ways: Carnap,
Cassirer, and Heidegger, Chicago: Open Court
- Gabriel, Gottfried, 1989a, ‘Lotze und die Entstehung der
modernen Logik bei Frege’, introd. to Lotze L1,
xi-xxxv
- -----, 1989b, ‘Objektivität: Logik und Erkenntnistheorie
bei Lotze und Frege’, introd. to Lotze L3, ix-
xxvii
- Glock, Hans-Johann, 1999, ‘Vorsprung durch Logik: The German
Analytic Tradition’, in O’Hear 1999, 137-66
{§6.1}
- Hönigswald, Richard, 1959, Analysen und Probleme:
Abhandlungen zur Philosophie und ihrer Geschichte, ed. Gerd
Wolandt, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer [35-6: Plato; 69: Hobbes and
nominalism; 84-6, 96-7: problem of universals solved through
‘analysis’; 203-4: analysis vs. distinction]
- -----,
1961, Abstraktion und Analysis: Ein Beitrag zur Problemgeschichte
des Universalienstreites in der Philosophie des Mittelalters,
ed. Karl Bärthlein, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer [opposition between
analysis and abstraction in relation to the problem of universals] {§3.1}
- -----, 1969, Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Methodenlehre: I.
Teil, ed. Hariolf Oberer, Bonn: H. Bouvier [152-63: definition
and analysis]
- -----, 1970, Die Grundlagen der allgemeinen Methodenlehre: II.
Teil, ed. Hariolf Oberer, Bonn: H. Bouvier [108: abstraction
vs. analysis; 206: analysis, induction and deduction; 241: analysing
vs. rationalizing]
- Köhnke, Klaus Christian, 1991, The Rise of
Neo-Kantianism, tr. R.J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press
- Lotze, Hermann, L, Logik, Leipzig, 1874, 2nd ed.
1880, Books 1 and 3 repr. as L1, Logik, Erstes Buch: Vom
Denken (Reine Logik), ed. G. Gabriel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner,
1989, and L3, Logik, Drittes Buch: Vom Erkennen
(Methodologie), ed. G. Gabriel, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1989
[Book 3, §§ 297-301: analytic vs. synthetic method]
- Natorp, Paul, 1910, Die logischen Grundlagen der exakten
Wissenschaften, Leipzig: Tuebner
- Rickert, Heinrich, 1892, Der Gegenstand der Erkenntnis,
Tübingen: Mohr, 2nd ed. 1904, 3rd ed. 1915, 5th ed. 1921
- -----, 1902, Die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen
Begriffsbildung, Tübingen: Mohr, 3rd ed. 1921, 5th ed. 1929,
tr. by G. Oakes as The Limits of Concept Formation in Natural
Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986
- Schmied-Kowarzik, Wolfdietrich, 1969, ‘Synthesis und
Analysis: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Hönigswalds
Hegel-Kritik’, Hegel-Studien 5, 225-57
- Trendelenburg, A., 1867, ‘Über Leibnizes Entwurf einer
allgemeinen Charakteristik’, Historische Beiträge zur
Philosophie, Vol. 3, 1-47
- Wundt, Wilhelm, 1880, Logik, Band 1: Erkenntnisslehre,
Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke
- -----, 1883, Logik, Band 2: Methodenlehre, Stuttgart:
Ferdinand Enke
- Bentham, Jeremy, WJB, The Works of Jeremy
Bentham, ed. John Bowring, Edinburgh, 1843
- -----, FO, ‘A Fragment on Ontology’, in
WJB, Vol. 8, 193-211 [on fictitious entities]
- -----, EL, ‘Essay on Logic’, in WJB,
Vol. 8, 213-93 [246-8: paraphrasis; 256-9, 275: analysis and
synthesis]
- -----, C, Chrestomathia, 1815 [appendix on
‘Nomenclature and Classification’]
- Boole, George, 1847, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic,
London and Cambridge, repr. in Studies in Logic and
Probability, ed. R. Rhees, London: Watts and Co., 1952
- -----, 1854, The Laws of Thought, London and Cambridge,
repr. in Collected Logical Works, Vol. 2, London and
Chicago: Open Court, 1940
- Bornet, Gérard, 1995, ‘George Boole’s Linguistic Turn
and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy’, in Hintikka and Puhl
1995, 236-48 {§6.1}
- Bradley, F.H., PL, Principles of Logic, Oxford,
1883, 2nd ed. 1922, corrected impression 1928; ch. 1, §§
1-4, 6-12, ch. 2, §§ 1-32, 38-45, 48-51, 53, 56-81, ch. 3,
§§ 1-7, 12, 15-20 repr. in WLM, Part I [95
(§64): analysis as alteration; ch. 6: analysis; ‘Terminal
Essays’, ‘A Note on Analysis’: reply to Spaulding
1912]
- -----, AR, Appearance and Reality, Oxford, 1893;
2nd ed. 1897 [425]
- -----, ETR, Essays on Truth and Reality, Oxford,
1914 [176: analysis as inadequate; ch. 10, section ‘On analysis -
its nature’; 270]
- -----, WLM, Writings on Logic and Metaphysics,
ed. James W. Allard and Guy Stock, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1994 [77-8 (PL, ch. 2, §64): analysis as alteration; 280
(ETR, ch. 4, 176): analysis as inadequate]
- Bradley, James, (ed.), 1996, Philosophy after
F.H. Bradley, Bristol: Thoemmes Press [includes Dwyer 1996,
Wilson 1996]
- Dwyer, Philip, 1996, ‘Bradley, Russell and Analysis’, in
J. Bradley 1996, 331-47 [Russell’s concept of analysis as
decomposition taken from Bradley]
- Holt, E.B., Marvin, W.T., Montague, W.P., Perry, R.B., Pitkin,
W.B. and Spaulding, E.G., (eds.), 1912, The New Realism, New
York: Macmillan [includes Spaulding 1912]
- Houser, N., Roberts, D. and van Evra, J., (eds.), 1997,
Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana
University Press [includes Levy 1997]
- Levy, Stephen H., 1997, ‘Peirce’s Theoremic/Corollarial
Distinction and the Interconnections between Mathematics and
Logic’, in Houser, Roberts and van Evra 1997, 85-110 [abduction;
analytic/synthetic distinction]
- McCosh, James, 1870, The Laws of Discursive Thought: being a
Text-book of Formal Logic, London: Macmillan; repr. Thoemmes
Press, Bristol, 1991 [§§ 62-4: analysis and synthesis;
§§ 65-75: logical definition]
- McHenry, Leemon B., 1992, Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative
Analysis, State University of New York Press [ch. 3, §3 on
genetic analysis]
- Mill, James, 1869, Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human
Mind, London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer
- Mill, John Stuart, SL, A System of Logic, in
Collected Works, Vol. 7, Toronto: University of Toronto
Press, 1973
- Ogden, C.K., 1932, Bentham’s Theory of Fiction, London:
Routledge
- Peirce, Charles Sanders, NEM, The New Elements of
Mathematics, ed. Carolyn Eisele, The Hague: Mouton, 1976, 4
vols. in 5 books [IV, 1-50: theoremic/corollarial distinction]
- Skorupski, John, 1989, John Stuart Mill, London:
Routledge [chs. 4-5: deduction]
- Spaulding, Edward Gleason, 1912, ‘A Defense of
Analysis’, in Holt et al. 1912 [critique of
Bradley]
- -----, 1918, The New Rationalism, New York: Henry Holt
and Co. [development of Spaulding 1912]
- Wilson, Fred, 1990, Psychological Analysis and the Philosophy
of John Stuart Mill, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
- -----, 1996, ‘F.H. Bradley’s Impact on Empiricism’, in
J. Bradley 1996, 251-82 [analysis and relations]
- Wisdom, John, 1931, Interpretation and Analysis in Relation to
Bentham’s Theory of Definition, London: Kegan Paul
{§1.2}
- Berg, Jan, 1962, Bolzano’s Logic, Stockholm: Almqvist and
Wiksell
- Bolzano, Bernard, 1837, Wissenschaftslehre, 4 vols.,
Seidel: Sulzbach [§§ 56-9: intensions; §§ 123-32:
composition of props.; §§ 147, 151-5: method of
substitution, relations between props.; §§ 148, 197:
analyticity; §§ 554-8: defs.]
- Coffa, J. Alberto, 1991, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to
Carnap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [ch. 2:
‘Bolzano and the birth of semantics’] {§1.2}
- Dummett, Michael, 1997, ‘Comments on Wolfgang Künne’s
Paper’, in Künne et al. 1997, 241-8 [reply to
Künne 1997]
- Kitcher, P., 1975, ‘Bolzano’s Ideal of Algebraic
Analysis’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
6, 229-69
- Kneale, William and Kneale, Martha, 1962, The Development of
Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press [365-9: Bolzano on
analyticity]
- Künne, Wolfgang, 1997, ‘Propositions in Bolzano and
Frege’, in Künne et al. 1997, 203-40
- Künne, W., Siebel, M. and Textor, M., (eds.), 1997,
Bolzano and Analytic Philosophy, Amsterdam: Rodopi [includes
Künne 1997, Morscher 1997, Rusnock 1997, Sebestik 1997, Textor
1997]
- Lapointe, Sandra, 2002, ‘Substitution: A further conception
of analysis in the early analytic and phenomenological
traditions?’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 40,
Supp. Vol., 101-13 [reply to Beaney 2002 {§4.1}]
- Morscher, Edgar, 1997, ‘Bolzano’s Method of Variation: Three
Puzzles’, in Künne et al. 1997, 139-65
[analyticity]
- Neeman, Ursula, 1970, ‘Analytic and Synthetic Propositions in
Kant and Bolzano’, Ratio 12, 1-25
- Proust, Joelle, 1986, Questions de forme, Paris: Fayard,
tr. as Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from
Kant to Carnap by A.A. Brenner, Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 1989 [II: Bolzano] {§1.2}
- Rusnock, Paul, 1997, ‘Bolzano and the Traditions of
Analysis’, in Künne et al. 1997, 61-85
[mathematical analysis and conceptual analysis]
- Sebestik, Jan, 1997, ‘Bolzano, Exner and the Origins of
Analytical Philosophy’, in Künne et al. 1997,
33-59
- Textor, Mark, 1997, ‘Bolzano’s Sententialism’, in
Künne et al. 1997, 181-202 [Bolzano’s notion of
paraphrase]
Supplement to Analysis
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy