Extended Bibliography on Distributive Justice

• Aaron, Henry J. and Munnell, Alicia H., 1992, “Reassessing the role for wealth transfer taxes”, National Tax Journal, 45: 119–143.
• Ackerman, Bruce A., 1980, Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Ackerman, Bruce A., 1983, “On getting what we don't deserve”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 60–70.
• Ake, C., 1975, “Justice as equality”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5.
• Alexander, Larry and Schwarzschild, Maimon, 1987, “Liberalism, neutrality, and equality of welfare vs. equality of resources”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16: 85–110.
• Alexander, Larry A., 1986, “Fair equality of opportunity: John rawls' (best) forgotten principle”, Philosophy Research Archives, 11: 197–208.
• Allingham, M., 1975, “Towards an ability tax”, Journal of Public Economics, 4: 361–376.
• Anderson, Elizabeth, 1993, Value in Ethics and Economics, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Andre, Judith, 1995, “Blocked exchanges: A taxonomy”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 171–196.
• Annis, David B. and Annis, F., 1986, “Merit pay, utilitarianism, and desert”, International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3: 33–41.
• Annis, David B. and Bohanon, Cecil E., 1992, “Desert and property rights”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 26: 536–546.
• Arneson, Richard, 1995, “Against 'complex' equality”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 226–252.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1981, “What's wrong with exploitation?”, Ethics, 91: 201–227.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1989, “Equality and equal opportunity for welfare”, Philosophical Studies, 56: 77–93.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1990a, “Against "complex equality"”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 4: 99–110.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1990b, “Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfare”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19: 158–194.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1991, “A defense of equality and equal opportunity for welfare”, Philosophical Studies, 62: 187–195.
• Arneson, Richard J., 1993, “Market socialism and egalitarian ethics”, in Market Socialism: The Current Debate, Pranab K. Bardhan Roemer and John E., eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 281–297.
• Arneson, Richard J., 2000, “Economic analysis meets distributive justice”, Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 26(2): 327–345.
• Arneson, Richard J., 2001, “Luck and equality ii”, Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume, no. 75 (suppl.), 73–90.
• Arneson, Richard J., 2002, “Why justice requires transfers to offset income and wealth inequalities”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 19(1): 172–200.
• Arnold, N. Scott, 1985, “Capitalists and the ethics of contribution”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 15: 89–105.
• Arnold, N. Scott, 1987a, “Recent works on marx: A critical survey”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 24: 277–293.
• Arnold, N. Scott, 1987b, “Reply to professor nell”, Ethics, 97: 411–413.
• Arnold, N. Scott, 1987c, “Why profits are deserved”, Ethics, 97: 387–402.
• Arnold, N. Scott, 1994, The Philosophy and Economics of Market Socialism: A Critical Study, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Arrow, Kenneth J., 1984, Social choice and justice, Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow ; v.1., Oxford: Blackwell.
• Arthur, John and Shaw, William H., 1978a, Justice and economic distribution, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Arthur, John and Shaw, William H. (eds.), 1978b, Justice and Economic Distribution, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Atkinson, A. B., 1983, Social justice and public policy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Baker, John, 1992, “An egalitarian case for basic income”, in Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform, Philippe Van Parijs, ed., London: Verso, 101–127.
• Barry, Brian, 1988, “Equal opportunity and moral arbitrariness”, in Equal Opportunity, Norman E. BOWIE, ed., Boulder and London: Westview Press, 23–44.
• Barry, Brian, 1989, Theories of Justice, Vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Barry, Brian, 1992, “Equality yes, basic income no”, in Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform, Philippe Van Parijs, ed., London: Verso, 128–140.
• Barry, Brian, 1995a, Justice as Impartiality, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
• Barry, Brian, 1995b, “Spherical justice and global injustice”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 67–80.
• Barry, Brian M., 1973, The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in "A Theory of Justice" by John Rawls, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Bauer, P.T., 1981, Equality, The Third World and Economic Delusion, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Baumol, William J. and Fischer, Dietrich, 1986, Superfairness : applications and theory, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Becker, Lawrence C., 1977, Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations, Boston , Mass.: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
• Becker, Lawrence C., 1980, “The moral basis of property rights”, in NOMOS XX11, John W. Chapman Pennock and J. Roland, eds., New York: New York University Press, 187–220.
• Bertram, Christopher, 1993, “Principles of distributive justice, counterfactuals and history”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 1: 213–228.
• Blake, Michael, 2001, “Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 30(3): 257–296.
• Blocker, Gene H., and Elizabeth H. Smith (eds.), 1980, “John Rawls' Theory of Social Justice:”, Athens: Ohio University Press.
• Bojer, Hilde, 2003, Distributional justice : theory and measurement, Routledge frontiers of political economy ; 47., London ; New York: Routledge.
• Bowie, Norman E. (ed.), 1988, Equal Opportunity, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
• Boylan, Michael, 2004, A Just Society, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Braybrooke, David, 1982, “The maximum claims of gauthier's bargainers: Are the fixed social inequalities acceptable?”, Dialogue (Canada), 21: 411–429.
• Brock, Gillian, 2005, “Egalitarianism, ideals, and cosmopolitan justice”, Philosophical Forum, 36(1): 1–30.
• Brody, Baruch, 1983, “Redistribution without egalitarianism”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 71–87.
• Buchanan, Allen, 1988, Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market, Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Burley, Justine, 2004, Dworkin and His Critics, Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Carens, Joseph, 1981, Equality, Moral Incentives and the Market, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Carter, Alan, 2000, “Distributive justice and environmental sustainability”, Heythrop Journal: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy and Theology, 41(4): 449–460.
• Christiano, Thomas, 1991, “Difficulties with the principle of equal opportunity for welfare”, Philosophical Studies, 62: 179–185.
• Christman, John, 1988, “Entrepreneurs, profits, and deserving market shares”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 6: 1–16.
• Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew, 2004, Social Justice, Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Cohen, G.A., 1995, “The pareto argument for inequality”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 160–185.
• Cohen, G. A., 1997, “Where the action is: On the site of distributive justice”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26(1): 3–30.
• Cohen, G. A., 2000, If you're an egalitarian, how come you're so rich?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Copp, David, “The Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Justice, Autonomy, and the Basic Needs” Social Philosophy and Policy 9. 1 (Jan 1992): 231–261.
• Corlett, J. Angelo (ed.), 1991, Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick, St.Martins Press.
• Crocker, Lawrence, 1977, “Equality, solidarity, and rawls' maximin”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6: 262–266.
• Daniels, Norman (ed.), 1975, Reading Rawls: Critical Studies of A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Daniels, Norman, 1978, “Merit and meritocracy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7: 206–223.
• Daniels, Norman, 1985, “Fair equality of opportunity and decent minimums: A reply to buchanan”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14: 106–111.
• Daniels, Norman, 1988, Am I my parents' keeper? : an essay on justice between the young and the old, New York ; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Daniels, Norman, 1990, “Equality of what: Welfare, resources, or capabilities?”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 50: 273–296.
• Dick, James, 1975, “How to Justify a Distribution of Earnings”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 248–72.
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1981a, “What is equality? part 1: Equality of resources”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10: 185–246.
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1981b, “What is equality? part 2: Equality of welfare”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10: 283–345.
• Dworkin, Ronald, 1983, “In defense of equality”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 24–40.
• Elster, Jon, 1992, Local justice : how institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Elster, Jon, 1995a, “The empirical study of justice”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 81–98.
• Elster, Jon, 1995b, Local justice in America, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Farrelly, Colin, 2002, “Genes and social justice: A rawlsian reply to moore”, Bioethics, 16(1): 72–83.
• Feinberg, Joel, 1970, Doing and Deserving, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Feldman, Fred, 19, “Justice, desert, and the repugnant conclusion”, Utilitas, 7: 189–206.
• Feser, E. 2005, “Personal Identity and Self-Ownership”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 22: 100–125.
• Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995, “Equal opportunity or equal social outcome?”, Economics and Philosophy, 11: 25–55.
• Fleurbaey, Marc, 2005, “Book symposium: Justice, luck and knowledge by s.l. hurley: Neutralising luck, rewarding effort”, Philosophical Books, 46(3): 188–198.
• Flew, Anthony, 1981, The Politics of Procrustes, London: Temple Smith.
• Flew, Antony, 1978, “Equality or justice?”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 3: 176–194.
• Frank, Jill, 1998, “Democracy and distribution: Aristotle on just desert”, Political Theory: An International Journal of Political Philosophy, 26(6): 784–802.
• Fraser, Nancy, 1997, Justice interruptus : critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition, New York: Routledge.
• Fried, Barbara, 1995, “Wilt chamberlain revisited: Nozick's "justice in transfer" and the problem of market-based distribution”, Philosophy and Public Afffairs, 24: 226–245.
• Fried, Barbara H., 2005, “Left-libertarianism, once more: A rejoinder to vallentyne, steiner, and otsuka”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33(2): 216–222.
• Fried, Charles, 1983, “Distributive justice”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 45–59.
• Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J., 1992, Choosing Justice, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Galston, William, 1986, “Equality of opportunity and liberal theory”, in Justice and Equality Here and Now, Frank S.Lucash, ed., Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 89–107.
• Galston, William A., 1991, Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Garcia, J.L.A., 1986, “Two concepts of desert”, Law and Philosophy, 5: 219–235.
• Garcia, J.L.A., 1988, “A problem about the basis of desert”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 19: 11–19.
• Gatens, Moira, 1991, Feminism and Philosophy: Perspectives on Difference and Equality, Indianapolis: Indianan University Press.
• Gaus, Gerald, 1990, Value and Justification: The Foundations of Liberal Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Gaus, Gerald F., 1980, “Property and justice: A select bibliography”, in NOMOS XX11, John W. Chapman Pennock and J. Roland, eds., New York: New York University Press, 385–406.
• Gaus, Gerald F., 1989, “A contractual justification of redistributive capitalism”, in NOMOS XXX1, John W. Chapman Pennock and J. Roland, eds., New York: New York University Press, 89–121.
• Gaus, Gerald F., 1991, “Does compensation restore equality?”, in NOMOS XXXIII . Compensatory Justice, John W. Chapman, ed., New York: New York University Press, 45–81.
• Gaus, Gerald F., 1996, Justificatory Liberalism, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gauthier, David, 1974, “Justice and natural endowment: Toward a critique of rawls' ideological framework”, Social Theory and Practice, 3: 3–26.
• Gauthier, David, 1982, “Justified inequality?”, Dialogue (Canada), 21: 431–443.
• Gauthier, David, 1986, Morals by Agreement, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Gibbard, Allan, 1976, “Natural property rights”, Nous, 10: 77–86.
• Glover, Jonathan (ed.), 1990, Utilitarianism and Its Critics, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Goldman, Alan H., 1977, “The principle of equal opportunity”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 15: 473–485.
• Goldman, Alan H., 1987, “The justification of equal opportunity”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 5: 88–103.
• Goodin, Robert E., 1985, “Negating positive desert claims”, Political Theory, 13: 575–598.
• Goodin, Robert E., 1988, Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Goodin, Robert E., 1995, Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Goodrum, Crain R., 1977, “Rawls and equalitarianism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 37: 386–393.
• Goodwin, Barbara, 1992, Justice by Lottery, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Gordon, Scott, 1980, Welfare, Justice, and Freedom, New York: Columbia University Press.
• Gorr, Michael, 1995, “Justice, self-ownership, and natural assets”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 267–291.
• Graham, Kevin, 2002, “Autonomy, individualism, and social justice”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(1): 43–57.
• Gray, T. S., 1981, “Herbert spencer's theory of social justice – desert or entitlement?”, History of Political Thought, 2: 161–186.
• Gutmann, Amy, 1980, Liberal Equality, London: Cambridge University Press.
• Gutmann, Amy, 1995, “Justice across the spheres”, in Pluralism,Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 99–119.
• Hammer, Sara, 2003, “Mutual obligation: Why reciprocity is an inadequate principle for unemployment programmes”, Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 5(1): 14–24.
• Hardin, Russell, 1999, “From bodo ethics to distributive justice”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice: An International Forum, 2(4): 399–413.
• Haslett, D. W., 1986, “Is inheritance justified”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 15: 122–155.
• Haubrich, Dirk, 2004, “Global distributive justice and the taxation of natural resources-who should pick up the tab?”, Contemporary Political Theory, 3(1): 48–69.
• Haworth, Alan, 1994, Anti-libertarianism, London: Routledge.
• Hayek, Friedrich A., 1976, Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice, London.
• Heath, Joseph, 1997, “Intergenerational cooperation and distributive justice”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27(3): 361–376.
• Held, Virginia, 1984, Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Action, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Hill, Christopher, 1985, “Desert and the moral arbitrariness of the natural lottery”, Philosophical Forum, 16: 207–222.
• Hinsch, Wilfried, 2001, “Global distributive justice”, Metaphilosophy, 32(1/2): 58–78.
• Hochman, Harold M., 2002, Economic behavior and distributional choice : selected writings of Harold M. Hochman, Cheltenham, UK ; Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
• Hochschild, Jennifer L., 1981, What's Fair: American Beliefs about Distributive Justice, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
• Honore, A. M., 1968, “Social justice”, in Essays in Legal Philosophy, R.S.Summers, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 66–81.
• Hurley, S. L., 2003, Justice, luck, and knowledge, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
• Hurley, Susan, 2001, “Luck and equality i”, Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volume, no. 75 (suppl.), 51–72.
• Hurrell, Andrew, 2001, “Global inequality and international institutions”, Metaphilosophy, 32(1/2): 34–57.
• Jencks, Christopher, 1972, Inequality, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Ltd.
• Jones, Charles, 1999, Global justice : defending cosmopolitanism, Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
• Jones, Peter, 2000, “Global distributive justice”, in <I>Ethics in International Affairs: Theories and Cases<D>, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
• Joseph, Keith and Sumption, Jonathan, 1979, Equality, London, U.K.: John Murray.
• Kang, Sung-Hak, 2003, “Free will and distributive justice: A reply to smilansky”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 31(1–2): 107–126.
• Keller, Simon, 2002, “Expensive tastes and distributive justice”, Social Theory and Practice: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy, 28(4): 529–552.
• Kelly, P. J., 1998, Impartiality, Neutrality and Justice: Re-Reading Brian Barry's Justice as Impartiality, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ Pr.
• Kelly, P.J., 1990, Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Kirzner, Israel M., 1989, Discovery, capitalism, and distributive justice, Oxford, England ; New York, N.Y.: Basil Blackwell.
• Kleinig, John, 1971, “The concept of desert”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8: 71–78.
• Klosko, George, 2000, Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus, New York: Oxford Univ Pr.
• Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 1996, Modern Theories of Justice, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
• Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 1997, Justice and equity, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 2005, Macrojustice : the political economy of fairness, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Korukonda, Appa Rao and Bathala, Chenchu Ramaiah T., 2004, “Ethics, equity, and social justice in the new economic order: Using financial information for keeping social score”, Journal of Business Ethics, 54(1): 1–15.
• Kukathas, Chandran and Pettit, Philip, 1992, Rawls: A Theory of Justice and its Critics, Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
• Kymlicka, Will, 1990, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Lake, Christopher, 2001, Equality and responsibility, Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
• Lamont, Julian, 1994a, “The concept of desert in distributive justice”, Philosophical Quarterly, 44: 45–64.
• Lamont, Julian, 1994b, “Pareto efficiency, egalitarianism, and difference principles”, Social Theory and Practice, 20: 311–325.
• Lamont, Julian, 1995, “Problems for effort-based distribution principles”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12: 215–229.
• Lamont, Julian, 1997, “Incentive income, deserved income, and economic rents”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 26–46.
• Langtry, Bruce, 1985, “The maximin rule argument for rawls's principles of justice”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 63: 64–77.
• Le Grand, Julian, 1991, Equity and Choice: An Essay in Economics and Applied Philosophy, London: Harper Collins Academic.
• Lessnoff, M.H., 1978, “Capitalism, socialism and justice”, in Justice and Economic Distribtuion, John Arthur Shaw and William, eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 139-149.
• Lomasky, Loren E., 1987, Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Lomasky, Loren E., 1995, “Justice to charity”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 32–53.
• Lucash, Frank S. and Shklar, Judith N., 1986, Justice and equality here and now, Cornell paperbacks., Ithaca, N.Y. ; London: Cornell University Press.
• Machan, Tibor R, 1988, The Moral Case For The Free Market Economy: A Philosophical Argument, Lewiston Mellen Press.
• Mack, Eric, 1983, “Distributive justice and the tensions of lockeanism”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 132–150.
• Mack, Eric, 1995, “Rights to natural talents and pure profits: A critique of gauthier on rights and economic rent”, in Profits and Morality, Robin Cowan Rizzo and Mario J., eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 124–149.
• MacLeod, A., 1983, “Equality of opportunity”, in Moral Issues, J. Narveson, ed., Toronto and New York: Toronto and New York, 370–378.
• MacLeod, Alistair, 1985, “Econonic inequality: Justice and incentives”, in Economic Justice, Kenneth Kipnis Meyers and Diana T., eds., Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld, 176–189.
• Macleod, Alistair M., 2005, “Distributive justice and desert”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(4): 421–438.
• Macleod, Colin M., 1998, “Liberalism, justice, and markets a critique of liberal equality”, .
• Macpherson, C. B., 1987, The rise and fall of economic justice and other essays, Oxford paperback., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Matravers, Derek and Pike, Jon, 2003, Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology, New York: Routledge.
• McClelland, Peter D., 1990, The American Search for Economic Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell.
• McKenzie Alexander, J., 2000, “Evolutionary explanations of distributive justice”, Philosophy of Science, 67(3): 490–516.
• McKerlie, Dennis, 2001, “Aristotle's theory of justice”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39(1): 119–141.
• McLeod, Owen, 1996, “Desert and wages”, Utilitas, 8: 205–221.
• McMahon, Christopher, 1989, “The better endowed and the difference principle.”, Analysis, 49: 213–216.
• Miller, David, 1976, Social Justice, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford.
• Miller, David, 1989, Market, State, and Community, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Miller, David, 1991, “Review article: Recent theories of social justice”, British Journal of Political Science, 21: 371–391.
• Miller, David, 1992, “Deserving jobs”, Philosophical Quarterly, 161–181.
• Miller, David, 1993, “Equality and market socialism”, in Market Socialism: The Current Debate, Pranab K. Bardhan Roemer and John E., eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 298–313.
• Miller, David, 1999, Principles of social justice, Cambridge, Mass. ; London: Harvard University Press.
• Mills, Eugene, 2004, “Scheffler on rawls, justice, and desert”, Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy, 23(3): 261–272.
• Milne, Heather, 1986, “Desert, effort and equality”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 3: 235–243.
• Moriarty, Jeffrey, 2002, “Desert and distributive justice in a theory of justice”, Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(1): 131–143.
• Moriarty, Jeffrey, 2003, “Against the asymmetry of desert”, Nous, 37(3): 518–536.
• Moulin, Hervé, 2003, Fair division and collective welfare, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Munzer, Stephen R., 1990, A Theory of Property, New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Murphy, Liam and Nagel, Thomas, 2002, The myth of ownership : taxes and justice, Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
• Nagel, Thomas, 1975a, “Libertarianism without foundations”, Yale Law Journal, 85: 136–149.
• Nagel, Thomas, 1975b, “Rawls on justice”, in Reading Rawls, Norman Daniels, ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1–16.
• Nagel, Thomas, 1991, Equality and Partiality, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Narveson, Jan, 1983a, “On dworkinian equality”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 1–23.
• Narveson, Jan, 1983b, “Reply to dworkin”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 1: 41–44.
• Nathanson, Stephen, 1998, Economic justice, Prentice Hall foundations of philosophy series., Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
• Nell, Edward, 1987, “On deserving profits”, Ethics, 97: 403–410.
• Nielsen, Kai, 1979, “Radical egalitarian justice: Justice as equality”, Social Theory and Practice, 5: 209–226.
• Nielsen, Kai, 1981, “Impediments to radical egalitarianism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 121–129.
• Nielsen, Kai, 1985, Equality and Liberty: A Defence of Radical Egalitarianism, New Jersey: Totowa.
• Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
• Nussbaum, Martha C., 1999, Sex and Social Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Olsaretti, Serena, 2003a, Desert and Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Olsaretti, Serena, 2003b, “Distributive justice and compensatory desert”, in <I>Desert and Justice<D>, Olsaretti, Serena (ed), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Olsaretti, Serena, 2004, Liberty, desert and the market : a philosophical study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Osberg, Lars (ed.), 1991, Economic Inequality and Poverty: International Perspectives, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
• Pateman, Carol, 1988, The Sexual Contact, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth (eds.), 1986, Feminist Challenges: Social and Political Theory, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
• Pettit, Philip, 1997, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Peyton Young, H., 1994, Equity: In Theory and Practice, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Pogge, Thomas W., 1989, Realizing Rawls, Ithaca: Cornall University Press.
• Pogge, Thomas W., 2000, “On the site of distributive justice: Reflections on cohen and murphy”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29(2): 137–169.
• Pogge, Thomas Winfried Menko, 2001, Global justice, Metaphilosophy series in philosophy., Oxford ; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
• Pogge, Thomas Winfried Menko, 2002, World poverty and human rights : cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms, Cambridge ; Malden, MA: Polity.
• Price, Terry L., 1999, “Egalitarian justice, luck, and the cost of chosen ends”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 36(4): 267–278.
• Rachels, James, 1978, “What people deserve”, in Justice and Economic Distribution, John Arthur Shaw and William, eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 150-163.
• Rae, Dougla, Yates, Douglas, Hochschild, Jennifer, Morone, Joseph, and Fessler, Carol (eds.), 1981, Equalities, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Rakowski, Eric, 1991, Equal justice, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
• Rawls, John, 1972, A Theory Of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Rawls, John, 1974a, “Reply to alexander and musgrave”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88: 633–655.
• Rawls, John, 1974b, “Some reasons for the maximin criterion”, American Economic Review, 64: 141–146.
• Rawls, John, 1975, “A kantian conception of equality”, The Cambridge Review, 94–99.
• Rawls, John, 1980, “Kantian constructivism in moral theory”, The Journal of Philosophy, 77: 515–572.
• Rawls, John, 1982, “Social unity and primary goods”, in Utilitarianism and Beyond, Amartya Sen Williams and Bernard, eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–185.
• Rawls, John, 1985, “Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14: 223–251.
• Raz, Joseph, 1978, “Principles of equality”, Mind, 87: 321–342.
• Rees, John, 1971, Equality, London: Pall Mall Press.
• Regan, Donald, H., 1980, Utilitarianism and Co-operation, Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
• Reiman, Jeffrey H., 1981, “The fallacy of libertarian capitalism”, Ethics, 92: 85–95.
• Reiman, Jeffrey H., 1983, “The labor theory of the difference principle”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12: 133–159.
• Rescher, Nicholas, 1966, Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co.
• Rescher, Nicholas, 2002, Fairness : theory and practice of distributive justice, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Riley, Jonathan, 1989, “Justice under capitalism”, in Markets and Justice, John H. Chapman, ed., New York: New York University Press, 122–162.
• Ripstein, Arthur, 1994, “Equality, luck, and responsibility”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23: 3–23.
• Roberts, Rodney C., 2002, “Justice and rectification: A taxonomy of justice”, in <I>Injustice and Rectification<D>, Roberts, Rodney C (ed), New York: Peter Lang.
• Roemer, John, 1985, “Equality of talent”, Economics and Philosophy, 1: 151–186.
• Roemer, John E. (ed.), 1996, Equal Shares: Making Market Socialism Work. The Real Utopias Project Volume 2, New York: Verso.
• Roemer, John E., 1998, Theories of distributive justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1st harvard university press pbk. ed.
• Roemer, John E., 2002, “Egalitarianism against the veil of ignorance”, Journal of Philosophy, 99(4): 167–184.
• Roemer, Jon E. and Elster, John (eds.), 1991, Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rosenberg, Alexander, 1995, “Equality, sufficiency, and opportunity in the just society”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 54–71.
• Ryan, John A., 1942, Distributive Justice, New York: Maximillan, 3rd Ed.
• Sadurski, Wojciech, 1985a, Giving Desert Its Due, Dordrecht, Holland: D.Reidel.
• Sadurski, Wojciech, 1985b, Giving desert its due : social justice and legal theory, Law and philosophy library ; v.2., Dordrecht ; Boston Hingham, MA, U.S.A.: D. Reidel ; Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Saunders, Peter (ed.), 1994, Welfare and Inequality, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
• Schaar, John, 1964, “Some ways of thinking about equality”, Journal of Politics, 26: 867–895.
• Schaller, Walter E., 1997, “Expensive preferences and the priority of right: A critique of welfare-egalitarianism”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(3): 254–273.
• Scheffler, Samuel, 1995, “Individual responsibility in a global age”, Social Philosophy and Policy, 12: 219–236.
• Scheffler, Samuel, 2003a, “Distributive justice and economic desert”, in <I>Desert and Justice<D>, Olsaretti, Serena (ed), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Scheffler, Samuel, 2003b, “What is egalitarianism?”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31(1): 5–39.
• Schweickart, David, 1980, Capitalism or Worker Control?, New York: Praeger Publishers.
• Schweikart, David, 1993, Against Capitalism, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
• Sen, Amartya, 1987, The Standard of Living, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sen, Amartya K., 1982, “Just desert”, New York Review of Books, 19: 3–6.
• Sen, Amartya K., 1985, Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North Holland.
• Shapiro, Ian, 1991, “Resources, capacities, and ownership: The workmanship ideal and distributive justice”, Political Theory, 19: 47–72.
• Shaw, John Arthur and H., William (eds.), 1991, Justice and Economic Distribution, Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Sher, George A., 1979, “Effort, ability, and personal desert”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8: 361–376.
• Sher, George A., 1987, Desert, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• Silver, Morris, 1989, Foundations of economic justice, Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
• Slote, Michael A., 1973, “Desert, consent and justice”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2: 323–347.
• Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, Bernard, 1973, Utilitarianism For and Against, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Smilansky, Saul, 1997, “Egalitarian justice and the importance of the free will problem”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 25(1–4): 153–161.
• Smilansky, Saul, 2003, “Free will, egalitarianism and rawls”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 31(1–2): 127–138.
• Soltan, Karol Edward, 1982, “Empirical studies of distributive justice”, Ethics, 92: 673–691.
• Soltan, Karol Edward, 1987, The Causal Theory of Justice, Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Steiner, H., 1981, “Liberty and equality”, Political Studies, 29: 555–569.
• Sterba, James, 1974, “Justice as desert”, Social Theory and Practice, 3: 101–116.
• Sterba, James P., 1980, The Demands of Justice, University of Notre Dame Press.
• Sterba, James P., 1994, “From liberty to welfare”, Ethics, 105: 64–98.
• Sunstein, Cass, R., 1997, Free Markets and Social Justice, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Sverdlik, Steven, 1983, “The nature of desert”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 21: 585–594.
• Swift, Adam, 1995, “The sociology of complex equallity”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 253–280.
• Swift, Adam, 1999, “Public opinion and political philosophy: The relation between social-scientific and philosophical analyses of distributive justice”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice: An International Forum, 2(4): 337–363.
• Swift, Adam, Marshall, Gordon, Burgoyne, Carole, and Routh, David, 1995, “Distributive justice: Does it matter what the people think?”, in Social Justice and Political Change., David S. Mason James R. Kluegel and Bernd Wegener, eds., New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 15–47.
• Tan, Kok-Chor, 2001, “Reasonable disagreement and distributive justice”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(4): 493–507.
• Tasioulas, John, 2005, “Global justice without end?”, Metaphilosophy, 36(1–2): 3–29.
• Taylor, Charles, 1986, “The nature and scope of distributive justice”, in Justice and Equality Here and Now, Frank S. Lucash, ed., Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 34–67.
• Temkin, Larry S., 1993, Inequality, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Vallentyne, Peter, 2003, Equality and justice, Ethical investigations., New York: Routledge.
• Van Niekerk, Anton A., 2004, “Principles of global distributive justice: Moving beyond rawls and buchanan”, South African Journal of Philosophy, 23(2): 171–194.
• Van Parijs, Philippe, 1995, Real Freedom for All, What (if anything) can justify capitalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press
• Varian, Hal R., 1975, “Distributive justice, welfare economics, and the theory of fairness”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4: 223–247.
• Waldron, Jeremy, 1983, “Two worries about mixing one's labour”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 33: 37–44.
• Waldron, Jeremy, 1988, The Right to Private Property, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Waldron, Jeremy, 1995, “Money and complex equality”, in Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, David Miller Walzer and Michael, eds., New York: Oxford University Press, 144–170.
• Wall, Steven, 2003, “Just savings and the difference principle”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 116(1): 79–102.
• Waller, Bruce N., 1989, “Uneven starts and just deserts”, Analysis, 49: 209–213.
• Walsh, Adrian J., 1997, A neo-Aristotelian theory of social justice, Avebury series in philosophy, Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate.
• Walzer, Michael, 1983, Spheres of Justice, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
• Walzer, Michael, 1985, Spheres of justice : a defence of pluralism and equality, Oxford: Blackwell.
• Walzer, Michael and Miller, David, 1995, Pluralism, justice, and equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Weatherford, Roy C., 1983, “Defining the least advantaged”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 33: 63–69.
• Wellbank, J.H. (ed.), 1982, John Rawls and His Critics: An annotated Bibliography, New York: Garland Pub.
• Westen, Peter, 1985, “The concept of equal opportunity”, Ethics, 95: 837–850.
• Wiggins, David, 1985, “Claims of need”, in Morality and Objectivity, T. Hoderich, ed., London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
• Wilkinson, T. M., 1999, Freedom, efficiency, and equality, New York: St. Martin's Press.
• Wilson, Catherine, 2003, “The role of a merit principle in distributive justice”, Journal of Ethics: An International Philosophical Review, 7(3): 277–314.
• Wood, Paul M., 2004, “Intergenerational justice and curtailments on the discretionary powers of governments”, Environmental Ethics: An Interdisciplinary Journal Dedicated to the Philosophical Aspects of Environmental Problems, 26(4): 411–428.
• Young, H. Peyton, 1994, Equity : in theory and practice, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
• Young, Iris Marion, 2004, “Responsibility and global labor justice”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4): 365–388.
• Young, Michael, 1958, The Rise of the Meritocracy, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Ltd.
• Zaitchik, A., 1977, “On deserving to deserve”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6: 370–388.
• Zajac, Edward E., 1995, Political Economy of Fairness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Zucker, Ross, 2001, Democratic distributive justice, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.