This is a file in the archives of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Supplement to Frege's Logic, Theorem, and Foundations for Arithmetic

Frege's ‘Derivation’ of Hume's Principle in Gg

In Gg, Fregean extensions do not contain concepts as members but rather objects. So Frege had to find another way to express the explicit definition of #F. His technique was to let extensions go proxy for their corresponding concepts. We may describe Frege's technique as follows. (What follows is an adaptation and simplification of the strategy Frege outlines in Gg I, §34ff.) Instead of defining the number of Fs as the extension consisting of all those first-order concepts that are equinumerous to F, he defined it as the extension consisting of all the extensions of concepts equinumerous to F. Here is a formula which says: x is an extension of a concept that is equinumerous to F:
H(x = H   &   H F)
We can name this concept using our -notation as follows:
[x H(x = H   &   H F)]
Instead of writing out this lengthy expression being an x which is an extension of a concept equinumerous to F, let us abbreviate our -notation for this concept as ‘F#’. Note that the extension of this concept, F#(), contains only extensions as members.

Now Frege's explicit definition of ‘the number of Fs’ can be given as follows:

#F   =df   F#()
This definition identifies the number of Fs as the extension that contains all and only those extensions of concepts that are equinumerous to F.

We can complete our preliminary work for the proof of Hume's Principle by formulating and proving the following Lemma (derived from Basic Law V), which simplifies the proof of Hume's Principle:

Lemma for Hume's Principle:
G #F     G F

(Proof of the Lemma for Hume's Principle)

This Lemma tells us that an extension such as G will be a member of #F just in case G is equinumerous to F. Clearly, since F is equinumerous to itself, it follows that #F contains F as a member. From these facts, one can get a sense of how Frege derived Hume's Principle Basic Law V in Gg. Here is a reconstruction of the argument.
Proof of Hume's Principle from Basic Law V

Return to Frege's Logic, Theorem, and Foundations for Arithmetic

Copyright © 1998 by
Edward N. Zalta
zalta@stanford.edu

First published: June 10, 1998
Content last modified: June 10, 1998