Supplement to Common Knowledge

Proof of Proposition 2.5

Proposition 2.5.
ω ∈ KmN(A) iff
(1) For all agents i1, i2, … , imN, ω ∈ Ki1Ki2Kim(A)

Hence, ω ∈ K*N(A) iff (1) is the case for each m ≥ 1.

Proof.
Note first that

(2)      

i1N
Ki1 (  

i2N
Ki2 ((  

im−1N
Kim−1 (  

imN
Kim(A) ) ) ) )

      =    

i1N
Ki1 (  

i2N
Ki2 ((  

im−1N
Kim−1(K1N(A))) ) )

      =    

i1N
Ki1 (  

i2N
Ki2(  

im−2N
Kim−2(K2N(A)) ) )

      = …

      =    

i1N
Ki1(Km−1N(A))

      =   KmN(A)

By (2),

KmN(A) ⊆ Ki1Ki2Kim(A)

for i1, i2, …, imN, so if ω ∈ KmN(A) then condition (1) is satisfied. Condition (1) is equivalent to

ω ∈  

i1N
Ki1 (  

i2N
Ki2 ((  

im−1N
Kim−1 (  

imN
Kim(A) ) ) ) )

so by (2), if (1) is satisfied then ω ∈ KmN(A). □

Return to Common Knowledge

Copyright © 2013 by
Peter Vanderschraaf <pvanderschraaf@ucmerced.edu>
Giacomo Sillari <gsillari@sas.upenn.edu>

Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free


The SEP would like to congratulate the National Endowment for the Humanities on its 50th anniversary and express our indebtedness for the five generous grants it awarded our project from 1997 to 2007. Readers who have benefited from the SEP are encouraged to examine the NEH’s anniversary page and, if inspired to do so, send a testimonial to neh50@neh.gov.